Gender and Language Biases

    Around the world, language is the driving force for human interconnectivity. Despite this, a significant difference exists between how men and women use their language. From a young age, we are taught how to represent ourselves and who we are with the way we speak. At a young age, men are allowed to rage and express themselves, while women need to control themselves. Unconsciously, our gender can help shape the language we use because of assumed gender roles. 

    Women are taught to use language in a way that puts them at a disadvantage in the workforce. Women use less assertive language than men, causing less advancement throughout ranks. Studies show that in employee evaluations, women are two times more likely to be considered more "helpful" and team players than men who are seen as "visionaries" and applauded for their accomplishments. Women are over two times more likely to be called "aggressive" while men are seven times more likely to be called "soft". 

    Another example we discussed in class was elementary schoolers using characteristics in their stories to the point you could guess who wrote it. In class, we noted that women's stories were very likely to be written about community, nature, and achieving goals as a team. On the other hand, men are likely to write about contests, solo achievements, and overcoming community norms. All of these trends are subconsciously taught early in our lives.

    As these differences are brought to light, so does the need for a plural, gender-neutral way of addressing people. The commonplace term "guys" is typically used to address any group of people. However, people believe that this term puts men in a position of superiority. Other options such as "y'all" or "folks" aren't great options either because of regional differences and informality. Unfortunately, there is no real way to fix this issue and there will always be a group of objectors. 

    In my experience, the only times I can remember noticing this language is in Mrs. Kirschmann's classroom. She always addresses the class and individuals as various different things. Similarly to the argument about using "guys", the replacement words she uses lack formality and often make people laugh. This is a real world example of somebody who is trying to eliminate gender-biased language from their vocabulary.