For me, the
most interesting material of those we read and saw this week was the Ted talk
by Caroline Heldman. What struck me most was the extensive list of the negative
effects of self-objectification. The list’s range from lowered self-esteem to
lower GPA was very interesting to me. It seemed clear that the objectification
of women was having an enormously negative effect on women. I would be curious
to see her research that supported her assertion that objectification had gone
up since the 60s and 70s. From a purely anecdotal perspective, it seems that
many outward expressions of sexism have gone down since the 60s and 70s, and I
would be curious to see how objectification fits in with the greater theme. At
the same time, I could see what she meant in the proliferation of ads and the
need for advertisers to cut through the clutter by exaggerating previous
advertising norms. I also found her list of the seven ways to identify sexual
objectification very interesting and a useful sounding tool.
Mrs.
Struck’s presentation was also very interesting. I thought she made great use
of art history to show the evolution or lack thereof of the presentation of
women in art. Her descriptions of women as forced into the categories of slut,
earth mother, and virgin was also very interesting to me. I can see that women
are often forced into these categories, especially in shorter and/or older
pieces of art, advertising, and literature. One possible reason for shorter
pieces relying more on these images might be that it can allow the creator to
easily establish a character with little to no real information.
Finally, I
did not particularly enjoy Laura Mulvey’s paper. While I agreed with many of
her assertions, such as the idea that women are far less active than men in
movies, I thought that she had very little empirical evidence. In article
entirely about the portrayal of women in films, she cited only eight films and
no other original research. Furthermore, what evidence she did have relied
largely on the theories of Sigmund Freud. While Freud may have been brilliant, he
was also a cocaine addict whose theories are often viewed as extraordinarily
outdated and based on little empirical evidence. On the whole, I thought that
these factors took away from Laura Mulvey’s greater points, which I generally
agreed with. I certainly feel that women are too often sexualized and
objectified in films, especially when compared with men. I also agreed with her
point that the male gaze, and the male point of view, are often those adopted
by society and entertainment as a whole, something that I cannot imagine is
good for women. Overall, I found this set of articles and the presentation very
interesting, if occasionally flawed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think about this issue?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.