The play was not only entertaining but eye opening as
well. I could imagine how controversial
it would have been in the days when it actually debuted. What was most interesting to me was the
blonde woman’s reluctance to step outside of her gender role. Both women were supposed to merely sit while
their husbands did all the detective work, and the blonde was, at first,
content to do so. In a way, the other
woman acted almost as a devil’s advocate; she was the initiator of the ‘bad’ behavior.
This conscience vs initiator relationship created the
conflict of the play. The women were the
ones creating the conflict, not the men.
This in itself was cause for controversy in the early 20th
century. Both women ended up finding
sufficient evidence that it was the wife that killed her husband, but rather
than turn away from her, both women came together to protect the wife.
In order to protect the wife, they had to actively remove
evidence from their husbands and the detective.
By hiding information, they gained an element of power over the men in
this play. Looking at the play overall,
the men were heavily stereotyped, but the women were not. The detective was chauvinistic and
condescending, while thinking that he was charming. Each of the husbands were displayed as
idiots, who just followed around the detective and laughed at all his
jokes. The women, however, were exposed
to conflicting morals and ideas that they themselves worked through in order to
protect each other. The play was
fascinating and I definitely want to look more into early feminist writings
outside of class.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think about this issue?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.